UN2814 transport packaging: what the four test groups demonstrate
A类生物安全运输箱应审核组合包装证据,而不只看箱体外观。陆冰资料TJA20221109-0657对所送A类生物安全运输箱(UN2814)进行了跌落、堆码、密封和穿孔试验,各列示项目判定为符合。

官网相关产品展示 / Related product shown on LuBing’s website。图片用于选型参考,具体型号与报告样品须对应核对 / Match the actual model to the tested sample.
结果包括低温预处理后9 m跌落、附加9 m跌落、3 m堆码24小时、95 kPa压差密封及7 kg/1 m穿孔条件。它们对应不同运输受力风险,不能只摘取一个“合格”。
报告描述包装由塑料箱、塑料密封罐和支撑冰盒组成,测试内装物包含一支10 ml试管。改变内罐、支撑方式或装载数量后,不能自动沿用同一结论。
报告采用IATA第63版及ICAO 2021–2022版依据,2022年签发。它提供既有测试证据;实际发运仍应核对现行要求、包装说明及承运人接受条件。
不能。必须先由负责人员确定货物分类,并确认包装配置、数量、运输方式及相应文件。
Category A packaging procurement should review the complete tested system, not merely the outer case. LuBing report TJA20221109-0657 records drop, stacking, leakproofness and puncture tests on the submitted UN2814 package, with the listed results marked conforming.
The results include a 9 m drop after cold conditioning, an additional 9 m drop, stacking at 3 m for 24 hours, 95 kPa differential-pressure testing and a 7 kg/1 m puncture condition. These address different stresses; a standalone PASS obscures the context.
The report describes a plastic box, plastic sealed canister and supporting ice boxes, with a test load including one 10 ml tube. Changing the canister, supports or quantity does not automatically retain the same evidence.
The 2022 report cites IATA 63rd Edition and ICAO 2021–2022 requirements. It is historical test evidence; actual shipments still need review against current requirements, packaging instructions and carrier acceptance.
No. Responsible personnel must determine classification and confirm packaging configuration, quantity, transport mode and documentation.